City must give province decision on mid-pen highway this week
Fri
05 Sep 2003 - Burlington
Post - Byline:
Robb Swybrous
City
council was deciding last night (Thursday) whether to approve an
agreement
made between the province and municipal/regional governments to
revise the
terms of reference of environmental assessment (EA) for the
proposed
mid-peninsula highway.
Details
of the agreement were released to Burlington residents Wednesday at
a public
information session at Mainway Arena. A second information session
was scheduled
for last night followed by a special council meeting where
Burlington's
elected officials were expected to vote on the recently
reached
agreement.
City officials
had until last night to inform the MTO of council's decision.
Wednesday's
information session heard Leo DeLoyde, the city's general
manger of
development and infrastructure, call the agreement a positive
step in
getting the Ministry of Transportation to consider concerns
Burlington
residents have over the proposed highway between Fort Erie, Ont.
and the
Greater Toronto Area.
"It's significant
movement on the part of the ministry to deal with the
community
issues of Burlington and Hamilton," he said. "We (City of
Burlington
staff) recommend council approve it at this stage."
As of Wednesday
evening, city officials had yet to have written
confirmation
of the agreement in principle reached last week between the
MTO and
municipal governments of Burlington, Hamilton and regional
officials
from Halton and Niagara.
An original
terms of reference for the EA was submitted in May by the
province.
City of Burlington and Halton Region staff and elected officials
didn't like
much of what was proposed in it and in June the groups filed a
judicial
review of the terms of reference with Ontario Superior Court of
Justice.
Ten days later MTO minister Frank Klees withdrew the original
document
and agreed to meet with stakeholders on the issue. That prompted
the recent
meetings that resulted in the agreement presented to the public.
Details
of the agreement include:
Considering
Smart Growth solutions -- the MTO agreed to consider options to
a highway
in the mid-peninsula corridor. Options include widening existing
roads and
considering additional transit and rail alternatives.
Modeling
data -- previous planning models used data from 1996. The MTO
agreed to
use 2001 data that is the most up to date available.
Steering
committee -- MTO agreed to establish a new steering committee/
advisory
group to consult with the government. That group will likely
consist
of elected officials from the concerned municipalities/regions and
members
of stakeholder groups including the Ontario Chamber of Commerce,
Citizens
Opposed to Paving the Escarpment and the Ontario Federation of
Agriculture.
Urban-rural
boundary issues -- MTO agreed to account for Burlington's and
Hamilton's
long-rang planning programs and urban-rural boundaries in EA
decision
making.
The agreement
also called for improved turnaround times on information
regarding
the proposed mid-peninsula highway to allow the public sufficient
time to
review documents and materials.
Gary Wrathwall
of Burlington attended Wednesday's session and was pleased
with the
MTO's movement.
"I
think they've made a significant move. Before it was a fait d'accompli
that it
would be built," he said. "Now they seem to be more open to other
questions
(like) do we even need a mid-peninsula highway?
"I think
the people of Burlington will be pretty happy with this. I
certainly
am."
There were
concerns expressed by some in attendance, however. One resident
wondered
whether this sudden softening in what had been a firm stance by
the MTO
to push the highway through is part of a ploy to garner votes in
the upcoming
provincial election. Others wondered if a new minister would
pull the
agreement off the table after Oct. 2.
DeLoyde
said since much of the MTO work is done by paid ministry staff who
remain in
their jobs regardless of the election's outcome, the agreement
isn't likely
to change after Oct. 2.